________________________________________________________________________________________________
⬆⬆
Quite obviously
Quite obviously
THIS IS NOT
Paul Oliverio
Paul Oliverio
Quite obviously*
THIS IS
Paul Oliverio
Paul Oliverio
⬇⬇
The Subject of the 2nd image
is not worth further discussion.
The Subject of the 1st image
is–undeniably–
YVES KLEIN
He is a 20th century
French artist who–
fifty years ago–
was as popular in Paris
as Andy Warhol was
in the United States.
Here are some samples
of Mr. Klein's art:
is not worth further discussion.
The Subject of the 1st image
is–undeniably–
YVES KLEIN
He is a 20th century
French artist who–
fifty years ago–
was as popular in Paris
as Andy Warhol was
in the United States.
Here are some samples
of Mr. Klein's art:
 |
| Both images are from here. More Yves Klein images from the Restany book can be found there. But a closer look at the book cover reveals another name:  As for the asterisk above (Quite Obviously*)  The woman who photographed me on July 4, 2016 is the same woman who designed the Klein book jacket in 1982. But the book cover image at the very top of this page is a "reworked version of the jacket designed by" C. Robson. Here is her original jacket design"  |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Top image is corruption of my jacket design,
ReplyDeletenot done by me.
Probably for new edition.
By shading your original jacket design–
Deleteand Blue-ifying it, the "new" image
lessens the black and white intensity.
Corruption is a relatively
nice way of describing it.
I would call it
dumbing it down.
However, it works for the purpose
of this very vain and egotistical page.
The flatinization and "drab blue-ification"
ReplyDeleteof the revised jacket is an irritant.
And P E O is more like the vibrant jacket.
But I K-ky jacket is like a flag to da bull.
O K Doki
Delete